Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is much better than Moto G Fast, having a score of 84.3 against 72.2. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's body is a lot newer and thinner than the Moto G Fast's, although it is somewhat heavier. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has newer 14 version and Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, so it provides you some nice extra features and a performance increase.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has an incredibly better looking screen than Moto G Fast, because it has a way higher 2224 x 2488px resolution, way more pixels per inch of screen and a larger screen. Motorola Moto G Fast has an extremely better processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 shoots way better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a much bigger back camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality, a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a lot better video definition.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with greater battery duration than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.