Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-05-09 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Pearl white | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is much better than the Moto G Fast, getting a global score of 80.6 against 72.2. Despite being the best cellphone in this review, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a just a little heavier and just a little thicker cellphone than the Moto G Fast. These devices include the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide identical operating system features.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has more RAM. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a brighter display than Moto G Fast, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a little bit larger display and a higher display density.
Moto G Fast features a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing pictures or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has improved battery life than Moto G Fast, because it has a 5260mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Fast, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.