Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Pearl white | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a global score of 87.9, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has 10 version while Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11 version. Even though Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro and Motorola Moto G Fast were only released 1 months apart, Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's design is a bit thinner but somewhat heavier.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an incredibly better looking screen than Moto G Fast, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a little bit larger display and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots greater pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing images and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos, a lot higher video definition and a camera with lot more MP.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has improved battery performance than Moto G Fast, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.