Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Pearl white | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Plastic | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is much better than Motorola Moto G Fast, having a overall score of 82.4 against 72.2. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is just a bit heavier than Motorola Moto G Fast, it's somewhat thinner and also newer.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Moto G Fast, because it has a little bit larger screen, a much better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a better count of pixels per display inch. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has 64 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a bit faster processor than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has 3 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features greater battery life than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is more expensive than Moto G Fast, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.