Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | -- |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is better than Motorola Moto G Fast, getting a score of 86.1 against 72.2. These phones include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a a little thinner but just a bit heavier cellphone than Motorola Moto G Fast.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a way higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels, much more pixels per inch in the screen and a quite bigger display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a little faster processing unit than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a much better camera than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a way higher 108 MP resolution camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features better battery performance than Moto G Fast, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.