Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | -- |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Pearl white | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a little bit better than the Moto G Fast, getting a 77.1 score against 72.2. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a a little heavier but thinner device than Moto G Fast. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that.
The Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a much better performing processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features an incredibly better display than Moto G Fast, because it has a little bigger screen, a much better 2080 x 2400 resolution and a way better display density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Moto G Fast, because it has more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with superior battery performance than Moto G Fast, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a very superior camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.