Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is much better than Moto G Fast, having a 91.5 score against 72.2. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer's design is noticeably newer and a little bit thinner, but just a little heavier than Moto G Fast. These phones use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a newer 12 version and Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, so it provides the user some additional features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a bit superior CPU than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has an incredibly better looking screen than Moto G Fast, because it has a higher screen density, a quite larger display and a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a bit longer battery duration than Moto G Fast, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a much more mega pixels back camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.