Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Pearl white | Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a score of 75.7, which is a bit better than Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has 12 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, giving you a couple additional features and performance improvements. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro design is much newer, a little bit lighter and thinner than Moto G Fast.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro features an incredibly better looking screen than Moto G Fast, because it has a little bigger screen, a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and more pixels per screen inch. Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a lot better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also counts with a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has greater battery performance than Moto G Fast, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.