Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-01-15 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 is better than the Moto G Fast, having a score of 80.3 against 72.2. Even though the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 is older than Moto G Fast, it's body is thinner and just a little lighter. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has 1 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with a sharper display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch of screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with a much better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back, higher video frame rate and a way larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 and Motorola Moto G Fast feature really similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.