Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | ZTE |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Ochre and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro is a bit better than Moto G Fast, with a 76.6 score against 72.2. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Moto G Fast has Android 11, counting with some additional features. ZTE Axon 10s Pro's design is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than the Moto G Fast, even when both were released with only 4 months difference.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a higher pixel density, a quite larger screen and a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a bit better processor than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has more RAM.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G Fast, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a battery lifetime that's just as good as Moto G Fast's battery duration.
Motorola Moto G Fast features a little bit better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a way tinier sensor which gives a much lower photo and video quality and a way worse 16 megapixels resolution back camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Moto G Fast also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.