Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | ZTE |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-03-30 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 11 has a general score of 76, which is just a bit better than Moto G Fast's score of 72.2. ZTE Axon 11's construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than Moto G Fast, even though both of them were only released 2 months apart. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but ZTE Axon 11 has older 10 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11.
The ZTE Axon 11 has a much better screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better pixels number in each inch of display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. ZTE Axon 11 has a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cores, the ZTE Axon 11 also has more RAM memory.
ZTE Axon 11 has a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 2 TB. Moto G Fast takes clearer videos and photos than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a worse video definition and a back-facing camera with way less mega-pixels, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
The ZTE Axon 11 has a battery performance that is just as good as Moto G Fast's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.