Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2021-01-14 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Power (2021), with a score of 81.3 against 76.5. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ is older than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), it's construction is notably lighter and noticeably thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much sharper display than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater display density and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much greater storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better hardware performance than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The Moto G Power (2021) features a superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery size. The Moto G Power (2021) features just a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking photographs or video in low light environments, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G Power (2021) also counts with faster video frame rate, a way larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Power (2021). If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto G Power (2021), letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.