Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 160.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is slightly better than the Moto G Power (2021), with a 79.9 score against 76.5. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a much newer cellphone, and it is also a little lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G Power (2021). The Moto G Power (2021) features a really superior performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel amount per inch in the screen and a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Galaxy A25 5G features much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Power (2021), because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB and more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a slightly better camera than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photos in poorly lited environments and a way smaller sensor, it also counts with a back-facing camera with more MP and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G and Motorola Moto G Power (2021) both have incredibly similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.