Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a bit better than Moto G Power (2021), with an 83.8 score against 76.5. Samsung Galaxy A50's construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Moto G Power (2021), despite of the fact that it was released just a bit more than a year before. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and much more pixels per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit better hardware performance than Moto G Power (2021). They have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Moto G Power (2021) features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G Power (2021) also has a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a much larger sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality and better video frame rates.
The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
The Galaxy A50 costs more than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.