Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | Prism cube black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than the Moto G Power (2021)'s 76.5 global score. The Galaxy A51 5G is a a bit lighter and just a little thinner cellphone than the Moto G Power (2021), even when both were only released 9 months apart. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a better looking display than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per inch of display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit better camera than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have a camera in the back with a 48 mega pixels resolution and the same camera sensor size, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Moto G Power (2021), because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. Moto G Power (2021) counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G Power (2021), but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.