Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 160.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is better than Moto G Power (2021), having a general score of 90.7 against 76.5. Samsung Galaxy A52 is a thinner and a little lighter phone than Moto G Power (2021), although both of them were released with only 2 months difference. Galaxy A52 counts with a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch of screen and a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Power (2021), because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 features a little better processing power than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 also has more RAM memory.
Moto G Power (2021) counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh. Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots much better pictures and videos than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs in low-light situations, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more MP, a larger sensor providing a better image quality and a way better (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.