Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is much better than Moto G Power (2021)'s 76.5 general score. The Galaxy A52 5G is a somewhat thinner and just a little lighter cellphone than Moto G Power (2021), even when both of them were released with only 2 months difference. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a better display than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a lot higher screen density.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a superior camera than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light images, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a larger camera sensor and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Moto G Power (2021), because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) features a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.