Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 266 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is better than Moto G Power (2021), getting a score of 87.5 against 76.5. The Samsung Galaxy A71 is an older device than Moto G Power (2021), but Samsung was able to make it somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. The Galaxy A71 has a much better screen than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because it has a little larger display, a greater pixels number in each screen inch and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Galaxy A71 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A71 also has more internal memory. The Galaxy A71 has just a little better hardware performance than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A71 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A71 captures much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality, a camera in the back with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Motorola Moto G Power (2021) has a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy A71 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G Power (2021). So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy A71, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto G Power (2021), resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.