Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 266 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), having a general score of 90.8 against 76.5. The Galaxy Note 20 is a just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Motorola Moto G Power (2021), although both of them were released with only 5 months difference. Galaxy Note 20 has just a little better processing power than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a better looking display than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because it has a bit bigger display, a higher pixel density and a lot higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. Moto G Power (2021) captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Moto G Power (2021) also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light captures, a way more megapixels back-facing camera and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Moto G Power (2021) has more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Moto G Power (2021) has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Power (2021). If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Moto G Power (2021), letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.