Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Power (2021)'s general score of 76.5. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Note Fan Edition is way older than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), it's body is somewhat lighter and thinner. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G Power (2021). Both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a sharper display than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a way greater count of pixels per screen inch. Moto G Power (2021) features a slightly better storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto G Power (2021) also has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) has a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Moto G Power (2021) takes better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same camera aperture, the Moto G Power (2021) also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger sensor.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Power (2021). So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Moto G Power (2021), resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.