Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is much better than the Moto G Power (2021)'s 76.5 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older and a bit heavier phone than Moto G Power (2021), but Samsung managed to build it a little thinner anyway. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little faster processor than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features an incredibly better display than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3200, a quite bigger display and a lot more pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Moto G Power (2021), because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a battery lifetime that's just as good as the Moto G Power (2021) one. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much better photos and videos than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same sensor size, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Power (2021). If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto G Power (2021), letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.