Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is much better than Moto G Power (2021)'s global score of 76.5. Samsung Galaxy S22's construction is newer, thinner and lighter than Moto G Power (2021). The Galaxy S22 features a way better looking screen than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater pixel amount per inch in the display and a way higher 1080 x 2340px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 features just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 shoots much better videos and photos than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos and/or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot higher video definition and a higher 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Moto G Power (2021) has a bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S22, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Power (2021) has longer battery life than Galaxy S22, because it has a 35 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Power (2021). If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto G Power (2021), and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.