Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G Power (2021)'s 76.5 general score. Even though Galaxy S22 Ultra is just a bit heavier than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), it's a little thinner and also newer. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better display than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because it has a way better pixel quantity per inch in the display, a little larger screen and a much better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little better processing power than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
The Moto G Power (2021) has a better storage for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a battery lifetime that is just as good as Moto G Power (2021)'s battery life.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Power (2021). If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto G Power (2021), letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.