Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Sport has an overall score of 77.8, which is slightly better than Moto G Power (2021)'s 76.5 overall score. Galaxy S5 Sport is an older phone than the Moto G Power (2021), but it's just a bit thinner and noticeably lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a little bit better performance than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has 2 GB less RAM memory and lesser cpu cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a way better screen than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a lot better count of pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) also has a much bigger aperture for better low-light images, a lot better 48 MP resolution camera, a much larger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Moto G Power (2021) features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory. The Moto G Power (2021) features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 79% greater battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Power (2021). So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, else you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G Power (2021), letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.