Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-01-14 | -- |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | -- |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 11 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 Active is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Power (2021), getting an 80.9 score against 76.5. The Galaxy S6 Active construction is a little bit thinner and way lighter than the Motorola Moto G Power (2021). Galaxy S6 Active counts with a superior CPU than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64 bits processor and an extra GPU.
Galaxy S6 Active features an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a way better screen pixel density and a much higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Moto G Power (2021) counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G Power (2021) also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in low light environments, a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a much larger sensor taking much higher quality photos.
Motorola Moto G Power (2021) has a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 64 GB internal storage. The Moto G Power (2021) features a superior battery performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 43% more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S6 Active is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Power (2021). So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy S6 Active, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G Power (2021), letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.