Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Power (2021) is just a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active, having a global score of 76.5 against 75.8. Motorola Moto G Power (2021)'s design is way newer and a little thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with an incredibly better screen than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a lot greater pixels count per inch of screen.
Moto G Power (2021) features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G Power (2021) has a little better processing power than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto G Power (2021) also has a greater number of cores.
The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) also has better video frame rates and a much better resolution back camera. Moto G Power (2021) features superior battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Moto G Power (2021) is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.