Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 160.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 266 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than Moto G Power (2021), having a general score of 80.1 against 76.5. Although it's the best in this review, Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is older, incredibly thicker and somewhat heavier than the Moto G Power (2021). Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much sharper display than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater display pixels density and a way higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Power (2021). They have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Moto G Power (2021) takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light photos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G Power (2021) also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as Motorola Moto G Power (2021)'s one, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Moto G Power (2021) has just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Power (2021). If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Moto G Power (2021), giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.