Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 266 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than the Moto G Power (2021), with a score of 81 against 76.5. Even though Galaxy XCover Pro is better than the Moto G Power (2021), we must note that it's also older, a bit thicker and a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Power (2021). They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher display density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Moto G Power (2021) features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G Power (2021) also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs, a back facing camera with much more megapixels and better video frame rates.
Galaxy XCover Pro's memory for games and applications is just as good as the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Power (2021) has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G Power (2021). So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Motorola Moto G Power (2021), resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.