Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 160.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Moto G Power (2021), having a global score of 88.5 against 76.5. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is an older phone than the Moto G Power (2021), but Samsung made it lighter and extremely thinner. Galaxy Z Flip features just a little better hardware performance than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a sharper display than Moto G Power (2021), because it has a little bit bigger display, a way better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a lot more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a greater storage for games and applications than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
Moto G Power (2021) features a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) also has a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a larger camera aperture to take better images and video in low light situations and a much more mega pixels back camera.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Power (2021). So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto G Power (2021), letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.