Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 160.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than the Moto G Power (2021), getting a general score of 92.3 against 76.5. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is much thinner and lighter than the Moto G Power (2021), although both were released only a couple of months apart. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a brighter screen than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because it has a much better screen density, a bit larger display and a way better 1080 x 2636 resolution. Motorola Moto G Power (2021) takes slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography, a camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Moto G Power (2021) has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Power (2021). If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto G Power (2021), giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.