Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 160.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 11 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G Power (2021)'s 76.5 global score. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 and the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) were released with only 7 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is incredibly thinner but extremely heavier than the Motorola Moto G Power (2021).
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a better looking screen than Moto G Power (2021), because it has a higher screen density, a bigger display and a way higher resolution of 1768 x 2208px.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) features just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a much bigger aperture to take better low light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.