Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-04-13 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.42 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Dark Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is much better than Moto G Power 5G (2023), getting a global score of 85.5 against 74.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 has an older 11 version while Moto G Power 5G (2023) has Android 13. Even though Galaxy A51 is noticeably older than Moto G Power 5G (2023), it's construction is a little bit thinner and just a little lighter.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023). Both of them have a higher count of pixels per inch of display, an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a screen of the same size. The Galaxy A51 has an extremely better processor than Moto G Power 5G (2023), although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy A51 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Moto G Power 5G (2023), although it has a camera with less MP and a tinier diafragm aperture. The Galaxy A51 features a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023) has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.