Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-04-13 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.42 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Dark Blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is much better than Moto G Power 5G (2023)'s global score of 74.4. These devices use the same Android 13 OS, so both should provide the same OS features. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is a bit thinner than Moto G Power 5G (2023), but it's heavier and was released many years before.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a brighter display than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023), because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a little larger display and a bit higher count of pixels in each inch in the screen. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023), because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Moto G Power 5G (2023) features just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes way better photographs and videos than Moto G Power 5G (2023), and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.