Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2023-04-13 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.42 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Dark Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than the Moto G Power 5G (2023), with an 81.2 score against 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a a bit lighter cellphone than the Moto G Power 5G (2023), but both of them are 0.33inches thick. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version and Moto G Power 5G (2023) has Android 13.
Galaxy Note 3 has a better display than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023), although it has a bit worse count of pixels per inch of display, a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little bit smaller display. Galaxy Note 3 features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023), because although it has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an extra GPU.
Moto G Power 5G (2023) has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023) counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56% greater battery size.
Galaxy Note 3 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Moto G Power 5G (2023), although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega-pixels and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and video in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.