Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| 2023-04-13 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.42 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Dark Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023), having a 79.3 score against 74.4. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a lot older than the Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023), it's design is just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version while Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023) has Android 13.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a way better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023) features a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy Note 5 has a really superior processing power than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023), although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Moto G Power 5G (2023), although it has a camera with a way worse 16 mega-pixels resolution and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and videos in low-light situations.
The Moto G Power 5G (2023) counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.