Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-04-13 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.42 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Dark Blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023), having a global score of 98 against 74.4. Both of these devices include the same Android 13 OS (Operating System). Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a incredibly older, just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier phone than the Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023).
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much greater performance than Moto G Power 5G (2023), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a brighter display than Moto G Power 5G (2023), because it has a quite larger screen, more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes greater photographs and videos than Moto G Power 5G (2023), and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery duration is very similar to the battery life in Moto G Power 5G (2023).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.