Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-12 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Midnight Blue and Pale Lilac | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)'s score of 73. The Galaxy A50 body is lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), although it was released 5 years before. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much more powerful processor than Moto G Power 5G (2024), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a little sharper screen than Moto G Power 5G (2024), because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels number in each inch of display. The Galaxy A50 takes slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), because although it has a much less mega-pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy A50 features a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Moto G Power 5G (2024), and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A50 also has an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Moto G Power 5G (2024) features better battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.