Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-03-12 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Midnight Blue and Pale Lilac | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is better than the Moto G Power 5G (2024)'s 73 overall score. Although the Galaxy A50s is way older than the Moto G Power 5G (2024), it's design is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner. Both devices in this review work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version while Moto G Power 5G (2024) has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy A50s counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50s also has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50s features a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a greater camera than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a lesser mega pixels resolution camera.
Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) features better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.