Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-12 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Midnight Blue and Pale Lilac | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is much better than the Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), having a score of 85.5 against 73. Samsung Galaxy A51 is an a lot older phone than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), but Samsung was able to build it somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A51 has older 11 version while Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) has Android 14 version.
Galaxy A51 counts with a little sharper screen than Moto G Power 5G (2024), because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy A51 has an extremely better processor than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy A51 has a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A51 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 captures way better photos and videos than Moto G Power 5G (2024), although it has a back camera with a worse 48 MP resolution and a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and/or video in low light environments.
Moto G Power 5G (2024) counts with better battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.