Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-12 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Midnight Blue and Pale Lilac | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is much better than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), getting a 90.7 score against 73. The Galaxy A52 is a a little bit lighter device than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), but both are equally thin. Galaxy A52 features a bit more vivid display than Moto G Power 5G (2024), because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a little better pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 features a much greater hardware performance than Moto G Power 5G (2024), although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Moto G Power 5G (2024) features just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A52, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy A52 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Moto G Power 5G (2024), and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy A52 also has a back camera with a way better 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.