Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2024-03-12 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Midnight Blue and Pale Lilac | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Moto G Power 5G (2024), getting a 91.3 score against 73. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has an older 12 version and Moto G Power 5G (2024) has Android 14 version. Galaxy A52 5G is a a little lighter cellphone than the Moto G Power 5G (2024), but both are 0.33inches thick.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a little bit better screen than Moto G Power 5G (2024), because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a quite better number of pixels per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior processing power than Moto G Power 5G (2024), although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) features just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a greater camera than Moto G Power 5G (2024), and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a back camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.