Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-12 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Midnight Blue and Pale Lilac | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)'s 73 overall score. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version and Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) has Android 14. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is a bit thinner than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), although it is a little heavier and was released 4 years before.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), because it has a little bit larger display, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot better performance than Moto G Power 5G (2024), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G Power 5G (2024), and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. The Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots way better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.