Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2024-03-12 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Midnight Blue and Pale Lilac | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is better than Moto G Power 5G (2024)'s overall score of 73. Galaxy Note 3 is a lighter phone than the Moto G Power 5G (2024), but both of them are equally thin. These devices use Android OS, but Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version and Moto G Power 5G (2024) has Android 14.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a really superior hardware performance than Moto G Power 5G (2024), because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a GPU. Galaxy Note 3 has a brighter screen than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), although it has a little bit smaller display, a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a bit lower number of pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Moto G Power 5G (2024), although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video and a lot less megapixels camera. The Moto G Power 5G (2024) counts with a slightly bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Moto G Power 5G (2024) has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.