Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-12 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Midnight Blue and Pale Lilac | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is better than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), having a overall score of 86.3 against 73. Galaxy S10e is an notably older phone than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), but it is a little bit thinner and lighter anyway. Galaxy S10e features a lot better performance than Moto G Power 5G (2024), although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a more vivid screen than Moto G Power 5G (2024), because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher display pixel density. Galaxy S10e shoots slightly better photos and videos than Moto G Power 5G (2024), because although it has a much worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light images.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G Power 5G (2024), and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) has a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 61% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.