Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-12 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Midnight Blue and Pale Lilac | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), having a 94.8 score against 73. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 has older 13 version and Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) has Android 14 version. Galaxy S20 is an notably older phone than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), but it's just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter anyway.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features a much powerful processing unit than Moto G Power 5G (2024), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a much better display than Moto G Power 5G (2024), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
Galaxy S20 captures better photos and videos than Moto G Power 5G (2024), although it has a back facing camera with a way worse resolution, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. The Galaxy S20 features a very superior memory for applications and games than Moto G Power 5G (2024), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Moto G Power 5G (2024) features improved battery duration than Galaxy S20, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.