Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-12 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Midnight Blue and Pale Lilac | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is much better than Moto G Power 5G (2024), having a 90.8 score against 73. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE's construction has the same thickness than Moto G Power 5G (2024), but it is just a little bit lighter. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version and Moto G Power 5G (2024) has Android 14.
Galaxy S20 FE has a much faster CPU than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy S20 FE features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a just a little greater pixels density.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a better camera than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), although it has a much lower resolution back facing camera, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. Galaxy S20 FE has a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Moto G Power 5G (2024) features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.