Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-12 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Midnight Blue and Pale Lilac | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is much better than Moto G Power 5G (2024)'s score of 73. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a way older, a little bit heavier and just a little thicker phone than Moto G Power 5G (2024). These phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version while Moto G Power 5G (2024) has Android 14.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better looking screen than Moto G Power 5G (2024), because it has a better 1440 x 3200 resolution, a higher pixels quantity per inch of screen and a bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G Power 5G (2024), and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a really superior hardware performance than Moto G Power 5G (2024), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures way better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot more mega-pixels camera.
The Moto G Power 5G (2024) and the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G have very similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.