Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-03-12 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Midnight Blue and Pale Lilac | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge has a score of 78.1, which is a bit better than the Moto G Power 5G (2024)'s 73 general score. Galaxy S7 edge is an notably older device than the Moto G Power 5G (2024), but Samsung managed to build it incredibly lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. These devices include Android OS, but Galaxy S7 edge has newer 8.0 Oreo version while Moto G Power 5G (2024) has Android 14 version, so it provides the user a lot of extra features and optimized performance.
Galaxy S7 edge counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), although it has 4 GB less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores. The Galaxy S7 edge features a more vivid display than Moto G Power 5G (2024), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy S7 edge takes clearer videos and photos than Moto G Power 5G (2024), because although it has a camera with a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and videos. Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) counts with a better storage for apps and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.