Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-12 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Midnight Blue and Pale Lilac | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 has a global score of 81.7, which is better than Moto G Power 5G (2024)'s 73 overall score. Galaxy S8 is an older phone than Moto G Power 5G (2024), but Samsung was able to build it incredibly lighter and just a bit thinner anyway. Samsung Galaxy S8 features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy S8 has a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S8 features a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
The Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S8, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The Galaxy S8 captures clearer pictures and videos than Moto G Power 5G (2024), because although it has a much less MP back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light images and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.