Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-12 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Midnight Blue and Pale Lilac | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is much better than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)'s overall score of 73. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a much older and heavier phone than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), but Samsung managed to build it somewhat thinner anyway. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) has Android 14.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit sharper screen than Moto G Power 5G (2024), because although it has a little bit inferior pixel count per screen inch, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a little larger screen. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better hardware performance than Moto G Power 5G (2024), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Power 5G (2024), because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Moto G Power 5G (2024) counts with a bit better battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a better camera than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), although it has a much less mega pixels back-facing camera, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.